<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Models on Alex Herrero</title><link>https://alexherrero.dev/tags/models/</link><description>Recent content in Models on Alex Herrero</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://alexherrero.dev/tags/models/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>When my Claude allowance got cut</title><link>https://alexherrero.dev/thoughts/claude-allowance-cut/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://alexherrero.dev/thoughts/claude-allowance-cut/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For a couple of months, I worked almost entirely in Antigravity. I could see all the code as it was being edited in real time alongside plans that I could comment on. The workflow felt like real collaboration. One of the things I liked most was that it supported both Gemini and Claude. I could switch mid-task depending on what I was doing — reach for one model where it was strong, then the other — without leaving my setup. It was a nice way to work. Then the Claude allowance in Antigravity got brought down to a level I couldn&amp;rsquo;t really use, even for ultra subscribers, and the easy switching was gone. That forced me to rethink my whole harness and how I worked. It turned out for the better: I leaned into Claude, and for what I was doing it held up better than I&amp;rsquo;d given it credit for. I still use Antigravity for the things Gemini is good at, but now I follow a &amp;lsquo;best of breed&amp;rsquo; approach. So today I learned that the limit I didn&amp;rsquo;t ask for pushed me to a better setup than I&amp;rsquo;d have chosen on my own.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>